Can we use Skype?

I log in as Justanotherresidentsfan

"Just Another Bunty Fan" <dcjtee [at] aol.com> wrote in message
news:1152136229.887567.41490 [at] a14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Can we use Skype?
>
> I log in as Justanotherresidentsfan


No.................this has to be recorded for court records.

However the reason its being dealt with at Exeter has to do with causing
maximimum possible hassle for everyone but baldrick bunt, so I would think
he is going to strongly object to the telephone conferencing, preferring to
be in court alone, so he has every opportunity to tell more
lies......................

"Guy Fawkes" <davenull [at] blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:44acb24b [at] 212.67.96.135...
>
> "Just Another Bunty Fan" <dcjtee [at] aol.com> wrote in message
> news:1152136229.887567.41490 [at] a14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>> Can we use Skype?
>>
>> I log in as Justanotherresidentsfan
>
>
> No.................this has to be recorded for court records.
>
> However the reason its being dealt with at Exeter has to do with causing
> maximimum possible hassle for everyone but baldrick bunt, so I would think
> he is going to strongly object to the telephone conferencing, preferring
> to be in court alone, so he has every opportunity to tell more
> lies......................
Only one not telling the truth seems to be you Chris, now that is strange.

TNR

"TNR" <dropthisTNR [at] hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1152214409.1240.0 [at] proxy01.news.clara.net...
>
> "Guy Fawkes" <davenull [at] blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:44acb24b [at] 212.67.96.135...
>>
>> "Just Another Bunty Fan" <dcjtee [at] aol.com> wrote in message
>> news:1152136229.887567.41490 [at] a14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>>> Can we use Skype?
>>>
>>> I log in as Justanotherresidentsfan
>>
>>
>> No.................this has to be recorded for court records.
>>
>> However the reason its being dealt with at Exeter has to do with causing
>> maximimum possible hassle for everyone but baldrick bunt, so I would
>> think he is going to strongly object to the telephone conferencing,
>> preferring to be in court alone, so he has every opportunity to tell more
>> lies......................
> Only one not telling the truth seems to be you Chris, now that is strange.
>
> TNR


baldrick has lied both in person at an earlier court hearing, and within
written submissions to the court..................

"Guy Fawkes" <davenull [at] blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:44ad6b9d [at] 212.67.96.135...
>
> "TNR" <dropthisTNR [at] hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:1152214409.1240.0 [at] proxy01.news.clara.net...
>>
>> "Guy Fawkes" <davenull [at] blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:44acb24b [at] 212.67.96.135...
>>>
>>> "Just Another Bunty Fan" <dcjtee [at] aol.com> wrote in message
>>> news:1152136229.887567.41490 [at] a14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>>>> Can we use Skype?
>>>>
>>>> I log in as Justanotherresidentsfan
>>>
>>>
>>> No.................this has to be recorded for court records.
>>>
>>> However the reason its being dealt with at Exeter has to do with causing
>>> maximimum possible hassle for everyone but baldrick bunt, so I would
>>> think he is going to strongly object to the telephone conferencing,
>>> preferring to be in court alone, so he has every opportunity to tell
>>> more lies......................
>> Only one not telling the truth seems to be you Chris, now that is
>> strange.
>>
>> TNR
>
>
> baldrick has lied both in person at an earlier court hearing, and within
> written submissions to the court..................
>
Then argue that and produce proof at the CMC, seems straight forward enough.
Why wouldn't you?

TNR

"TNR" <dropthisTNR [at] hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1152216421.2839.0 [at] proxy01.news.clara.net...
>
> "Guy Fawkes" <davenull [at] blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:44ad6b9d [at] 212.67.96.135...
>>
>> "TNR" <dropthisTNR [at] hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:1152214409.1240.0 [at] proxy01.news.clara.net...
>>>
>>> "Guy Fawkes" <davenull [at] blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
>>> news:44acb24b [at] 212.67.96.135...
>>>>
>>>> "Just Another Bunty Fan" <dcjtee [at] aol.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:1152136229.887567.41490 [at] a14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>>>>> Can we use Skype?
>>>>>
>>>>> I log in as Justanotherresidentsfan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No.................this has to be recorded for court records.
>>>>
>>>> However the reason its being dealt with at Exeter has to do with
>>>> causing maximimum possible hassle for everyone but baldrick bunt, so I
>>>> would think he is going to strongly object to the telephone
>>>> conferencing, preferring to be in court alone, so he has every
>>>> opportunity to tell more lies......................
>>> Only one not telling the truth seems to be you Chris, now that is
>>> strange.
>>>
>>> TNR
>>
>>
>> baldrick has lied both in person at an earlier court hearing, and within
>> written submissions to the court..................
>>
> Then argue that and produce proof at the CMC, seems straight forward
> enough. Why wouldn't you?
>
> TNR


Due to the simple fact that it has already been decided this claim is going
to trial, and its pointless to waste my breath................

http://www.onebrickcourt.com/cases.asp?id=58

Bunt V. Tilley, Hancox, Stevens, AOL, Tiscali and BT [2006] EWHC 407 (QB)
Case Date: 10/03/2006

Held

(5) The litigation constituted an abuse of process in accordance
with the principles set out in Jameel v. Dow Jones as there was "no
realistic prospect of a trial yielding any tangible or legitimate advantage
such as to outweigh the disadvantages for the parties in terms of expense,
and the wider public in terms of court resources." [Para. 78].

Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)

<turtill [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:v73ra29fsjfoj6gd5dnf83vrcger7f18th [at] 4ax.com...
> On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 23:00:43 +0100, "Martin" <me [at] privacy.net> wrote:
>
> >http://www.onebrickcourt.com/cases.asp?id=58
> >
> >Bunt V. Tilley, Hancox, Stevens, AOL, Tiscali and BT [2006] EWHC 407 (QB)
> >Case Date: 10/03/2006
> >
> >Held
> >
> >(5) The litigation constituted an abuse of process in accordance
> >with the principles set out in Jameel v. Dow Jones as there was "no
> >realistic prospect of a trial yielding any tangible or legitimate
advantage
> >such as to outweigh the disadvantages for the parties in terms of
expense,
> >and the wider public in terms of court resources." [Para. 78].
>
> If he had a decent lawyer I think the outcome would have been in his
> favour.

The ISPs had a Section 1 defence all along. They were never at risk of
losing.
FFS read the above before bullshitting.

On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 21:20:41 +0100, "Guy Fawkes"
<davenull [at] blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

>
>"TNR" <dropthisTNR [at] hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:1152216421.2839.0 [at] proxy01.news.clara.net...
>>
>> "Guy Fawkes" <davenull [at] blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:44ad6b9d [at] 212.67.96.135...
>>>
>>> "TNR" <dropthisTNR [at] hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
>>> news:1152214409.1240.0 [at] proxy01.news.clara.net...
>>>>
>>>> "Guy Fawkes" <davenull [at] blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
>>>> news:44acb24b [at] 212.67.96.135...
>>>>>
>>>>> "Just Another Bunty Fan" <dcjtee [at] aol.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:1152136229.887567.41490 [at] a14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>> Can we use Skype?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I log in as Justanotherresidentsfan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> No.................this has to be recorded for court records.
>>>>>
>>>>> However the reason its being dealt with at Exeter has to do with
>>>>> causing maximimum possible hassle for everyone but baldrick bunt, so I
>>>>> would think he is going to strongly object to the telephone
>>>>> conferencing, preferring to be in court alone, so he has every
>>>>> opportunity to tell more lies......................
>>>> Only one not telling the truth seems to be you Chris, now that is
>>>> strange.
>>>>
>>>> TNR
>>>
>>>
>>> baldrick has lied both in person at an earlier court hearing, and within
>>> written submissions to the court..................
>>>
>> Then argue that and produce proof at the CMC, seems straight forward
>> enough. Why wouldn't you?
>>
>> TNR
>
>
>Due to the simple fact that it has already been decided this claim is going
>to trial, and its pointless to waste my breath................
>

I think you are right - I was discussing it with a bloke in the pub
the other night and he said there had been a full and frank discussion
at The Lodge last week, it is definitely going to trial, and even the
result is already known; I must admit I don't know this pub myself.

>
> I think you are right - I was discussing it with a bloke in the pub
> the other night and he said there had been a full and frank discussion
> at The Lodge last week, it is definitely going to trial, and even the
> result is already known; I must admit I don't know this pub myself.


The pub was "The Square and Compass"

Mike

--
------------------------------------------------
Royal Naval Electrical Branch Association
www.rnshipmates.co.uk
International Festival of the Sea 28th June - 1st July 2007

"Mike" <not [at] here.thanks> wrote in message
news:RaadnSt4S_WNODPZnZ2dnUVZ8qednZ2d [at] bt.com...
> >
>> I think you are right - I was discussing it with a bloke in the pub
>> the other night and he said there had been a full and frank discussion
>> at The Lodge last week, it is definitely going to trial, and even the
>> result is already known; I must admit I don't know this pub myself.
>
>
> The pub was "The Square and Compass"
>
> Mike
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------
> Royal Naval Electrical Branch Association
> www.rnshipmates.co.uk
> International Festival of the Sea 28th June - 1st July 2007
>


Sure it wasnt the nipple and sword?

Mark Horsman (nospam) wrote:

> You've missed the fact that Chris thinks.......

Or the fact that JOHN STUART BUNT is a
CLASS A DRUG DEALER, WOMAN ABUSER,
FRAUDSTER and can't get a stiffy!

Cheap Chrinese everything for everyone I say.

Just Another Bunty Fan wrote:
> Mark Horsman (nospam) wrote:
>
> > You've missed the fact that Chris thinks.......
>
> Or the fact that JOHN STUART BUNT is a
> CLASS A DRUG DEALER, WOMAN ABUSER,
> FRAUDSTER and can't get a stiffy!
>
> Cheap Chrinese everything for everyone I say.

I will see if I can import a cheap chinese prison for you, hope you
prefer it to HMP.