interesting.......
umm
"HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM LISTSERV Server , 14.4" <LISTSERV [at] HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
wrote in message
news:LISTSERV%200510310011203950.9822 [at] HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM...
> Mon, 31 Oct 2005 00:11:20
>
> You have been automatically removed from the BONSAI list (Internet Bonsai
> Club) as a result of repeated delivery error reports from your mail
> system. This decision was based on the automatic error monitoring policy
> in effect for the list, and has not been reviewed or otherwise confirmed
> by a human being. If you receive this message, it means that something is
> wrong: while you are obviously able to receive mail, your mail system has
> been regularly reporting that your account did not exist, or that you
> were otherwise permanently unable to receive mail. Here is some
> information which may assist you or your local help desk in determining
> the cause of the problem:
>
> - The failing address is gate-rec.arts.bonsai [at] NEWSPOST.NEWSGUY.COM.
>
> - The first error was reported on 2005-10-26.
>
> - Since then, a total of 13 delivery errors have been received.
>
> - The last reported error was: 5.0.0 X-Unix; 1
>
> PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE THIS MESSAGE. While you can of course re-subscribe
> to the list, it is important for you to report this problem to your mail
> administrator so that it can be solved. This problem is not specific to
> the BONSAI list, and also affects your private mail. This means that YOU
> HAVE PROBABLY LOST SOME PRIVATE MAIL AS WELL. Anyone trying to write to
> you during the same time frame will probably have received the same
> errors for the same reason. The BONSAI list is but one of the many people
> who may have tried to write to you while your mail system was
> malfunctioning.
>
> DO NOT LET TECHNICAL PEOPLE CONVINCE YOU THAT THIS IS NORMAL. It is never
> normal for a mail system to claim that a valid, working account does not
> exist, just as it would not be normal for the post office to return some
> of your mail with "addressee unknown" when the address was written
> correctly. It is true that some mail systems are less reliable than
> others, and your technical people may be doing the best they can with the
> tools they have. But, ultimately, the level of service that you are
> receiving is the result of a business decision, and not something due to
> a universal technical limitation that one can only accept. Reliable mail
> systems do exist, and it is ultimately up to you to decide whether this
> level of service is acceptable or not.
