Paph kovachii picture link
This flower is enormous!
http://forum.theorchidsource.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb= get_topic;f=38;t=003263
Diana
Re: Paph kovachii picture link
Wow! That is amazingly huge. Very neat.
Joanna
"Diana Kulaga" <diandfrankcat [at] bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:RW%qf.4153$Lb1.3591 [at] bignews3.bellsouth.net...
> This flower is enormous!
>
> http://forum.theorchidsource.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb= get_topic;f=38;t=003263
>
> Diana
>
Re: Paph kovachii picture link
Diana Kulaga wrote:
> This flower is enormous!
>
> http://forum.theorchidsource.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb= get_topic;f=38;t=003263
>
> Diana
>
>
Don't you think that the next to the last picture shows evidence that
they dug up a plant? If they didn't dig it up, they pretty thoroughly
molested it!
Steve
Re: Paph kovachii picture link
Steve schreef:
> Diana Kulaga wrote:
>
>> This flower is enormous!
>>
>> http://forum.theorchidsource.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb= get_topic;f=38;t=003263
>>
>>
>> Diana
>>
>
> Don't you think that the next to the last picture shows evidence that
> they dug up a plant? If they didn't dig it up, they pretty thoroughly
> molested it!
>
> Steve
That is exactly my first thought when I saw that picture!
Niek
Re: Paph kovachii picture link
Good eyes, Gentlemen. I confess that I didn't pay as much attention to that
picture when I first went to the site. Having gone back for a second look, I
agree.
The other thing is: the person who sent me the link in the first place now
thinks it's a Phrag. I grow very few Paphs and no Phrags, so I won't try to
comment. What do you think?
Diana
Re: Paph kovachii picture link
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 15:16:10 -0500 in <RZhrf.36550$aS5.972 [at] bignews4.bellsouth.net> Diana Kulaga <diandfrankcat [at] bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Good eyes, Gentlemen. I confess that I didn't pay as much attention to that
> picture when I first went to the site. Having gone back for a second look, I
> agree.
>
> The other thing is: the person who sent me the link in the first place now
> thinks it's a Phrag. I grow very few Paphs and no Phrags, so I won't try to
> comment. What do you think?
I thought the pouchers of the americas were phrags and cyprediums.
--
Chris Dukes
Suspicion breeds confidence -- Brazil
Re: Paph kovachii picture link
These are Phragmipediums.
-danny
"Diana Kulaga" <diandfrankcat [at] bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:RZhrf.36550$aS5.972 [at] bignews4.bellsouth.net...
> Good eyes, Gentlemen. I confess that I didn't pay as much attention to
> that picture when I first went to the site. Having gone back for a second
> look, I agree.
>
> The other thing is: the person who sent me the link in the first place now
> thinks it's a Phrag. I grow very few Paphs and no Phrags, so I won't try
> to comment. What do you think?
>
> Diana
>
Re: Paph kovachii picture link
Diana Kulaga wrote:
> ...........
> .........................
> The other thing is: the person who sent me the link in the first place now
> thinks it's a Phrag.
Oh, it's a Phrag all right. I didn't even notice that you had written
Paph until now. The name kovachii is so infamous at this point that it
only takes a glance at that name to know what plant we are talking about.
Steve