Links

Issociate
Impressum

Bookmarks

Yahoo Gmail Google Facebook Delicious Twitter Reddit Stumpleupon Myspace Digg

Search queries

big w whipper snipper, &esrc=s, best small trees for front yard in seattle, &esrc=s, &esrc=s, http://www.google.com/search, rasentrimmer faden dicke, rasenmäher hanglage, gartenschlauch ohne pvc, cutworm / leather jacket pesticides

#1: Rose bush - no blooms

Posted on 2005-08-10 15:08:11 by Phil

Hi

I'm no gardener but decided this year I would like to try my hand with
some rose bushes.

My issue is that one bush has not produced any buds at all. It appears
to be quite healthy in terms of growth and follage, just no buds.

My question is, should I hang on to the bush and hope it produces buds
next year, or is this a dud (blind ?) and best disposed off.

Phil


--
Phil

Report this message

Mr Ad

Google

#2: Re: Rose bush - no blooms

Posted on 2005-08-10 22:22:12 by dave weil

On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:08:11 +0000, Phil
<Phil.1tjxjy@gardenbanter.co.uk> wrote:

>
>Hi
>
>I'm no gardener but decided this year I would like to try my hand with
>some rose bushes.
>
>My issue is that one bush has not produced any buds at all. It appears
>to be quite healthy in terms of growth and follage, just no buds.
>
>My question is, should I hang on to the bush and hope it produces buds
>next year, or is this a dud (blind ?) and best disposed off.

Definitely hang on to it for next year, especially if it seems
vigorous this year. Roses like to spend their first year getting
established. This rose might have also been an early bloomer with just
one flush and you might have missed that opportunity. Any idea what
kind of rose it is?

Report this message